![uxterm git uxterm git](https://linuxhint.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/s5.png)
Performance can be a bit jerky depending on available bandwidth.
![uxterm git uxterm git](https://img2020.cnblogs.com/blog/235279/202008/235279-20200804152801563-1071063396.png)
I've used the TightVNC viewer for Windows to access a Linux box at work from home, and it worked fine.
![uxterm git uxterm git](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4a5_G7EYxcM/Wf-5HmAJ40I/AAAAAAAAJVA/eLjahbOqc4k03rQGDee8xi-FGYitBTRPQCLcBGAs/s640/Evil-Droid_1.png)
It's certainly not a trivial thing, anyway.Įdit: In response to your edited question, you shouldn't need to use a VNC viewer or anything like that either. In any case, getting a working X11 environment in Windows is likely to be a lot more hassle than doing it in Linux. That way, the application and the GUI are all on the Linux system and you don't have to muck around with remote X sessions. If you want to run a (gui) Java application on the Linux VM, it seems to me that the easiest thing to do would be to install the X11 environment in the VM and run the application in the VM console. I'm a little unclear on what you're trying to do, but if you just need to get a shell open, the easiest thing to do would be to install PuTTY and use it to telnet or ssh into the VM. Now VNC viewer connects and displays XTerm. So, why can't I just run "xterm remoteLinuxHost" just the way I do "telnet remoteLinuxHost"? Why there is a zillion steps to do such trivial thing? Would appreciate if anybody would guide me through this pain.Įdit: Running vncserver command on linux box made the setup. Do I run VNC server in service or user mode, or do I start the third option: VNC viewer? If you haven't noticed, I'm totally confused what is the server and what is client - I was told that X_window community got it totally wrong, and what everybody else in computer field calls client is server? Now, the GUI part, how would I run xterm on windows? I made several shots in the dark: installed XMing, and then got totally confused what to do next. The main problem is getting linux environment, and I'm unwilling to install one because I have a remote linux box already. But if there’s no compelling use case for them to be there by default, just as there’s no longer a compelling use case for Brasero or Empathy to ship out-of-the-box, a little clean-up wouldn’t hurt.Īfter all, those who want them can easily install them from Ubuntu Software.I have Swing Java application manifesting an error on linux, which I need to fix. It makes little appreciable difference whether Ubuntu 17.10 ships with 3 separate terminal entries in its launcher or not. We don’t get backup apps for anything else!Īnother supposed reason for the inclusion Xterm is to provide a “complete X env”.īut, as Quigley notes in his email, with Wayland very much on the horizon, mightn’t it make more sense to pull in any critical X environment packages explicitly, rather than relying on a terminal emulator to do so? But, even assuming it does, is xterm really that much of a benefit when a virtual console is but a combo press of Ctrl + Alt + F2 away? The official reason for including Xterm is to ensure there is a backup terminal available should GNOME Terminal have any issues. I only ever use GNOME Terminal, which is the default Ubuntu terminal emulator, or a GNOME Terminal alternative that I go out and install for myself. In an installed setup, those two menu items make gnome-shell have 3 pages instead of 2 in my testing.” But those differences are, to my end-user eyes at least, not especially self-evident.Ī discussion has kicked off on the Ubuntu desktop mailing list that suggests I am not alone in questioning the value of including quite so many terminals.Ĭanonical’s Brian Quigley explains: “Xterm takes up two menu items (xterm and uxterm) and doesn’t provide any more functionality then gnome-terminal. Naturally I presume there to be some differences between GNOME Terminal, Xterm and UXTerm. But a query that has, from time to time, confused me. It’s a minor little quirk, granted, and something few people will notice. I’ve often wondered why Ubuntu ships with several different terminal apps installed by default.